Economy
____________________________________________________
Water Balloons and Bailouts
Why you really don't want more regulation.
You really don't!
Or maybe you do want to move back in with Mom and Dad.
From
the perspective of a free market absolutist, as most Libertarians are,
all the clamour for more regulation as a knee jerk response to the
recent financial melt-down is humorous-- at least it would be if it
wasn't so serious.
My response to the "Regulate!" cheerleaders is this: It's simple. Have you grown up or do you still live with your parents?
Remember
when you were a teenager and you couldn't wait to get out of the house
so you could make your own decisions, earn your own money, spend your
own money as you saw fit, basically live and manage your own life for a
change? Did that work both ways or did it work the way the U.S. economy
is working? You were glad to have the independence when it came to
earning, keeping, and spending your money, but when you blew the
money, were you equally happy to have your liberty? Did you live with
the consequences, or did you go crawling back to Mom and Dad and ask
for a bailout? And if you did, did they oblige? Perhaps that is why we
have this problem.
You
see, as much as we think we want the Federal Government (or state or
local governments for that matter) to be ever vigilant at the bottom of
every cliff to catch us when we jump off, or fall, or are pushed... we
really don't-- unless we really enjoyed living with Mom and Dad and
being subject to their rules, once we were old enough to live on our
own..
If the government acts like Mom and Dad, beware. You could be grounded. The government that does everything for you, can take everything from you.
And isn't that what the demagogues are saying now? The government needs
to clean up this mess but as a result, they need to clamp down more. No
more late dates. There will be a curfew. And give us the car keys.
You'll have to earn it back.
Is
that what we want? And how does that work? The Congress of pork and
earmarks, of defecit spending out the wazoo, and the President who
makes Lyndon Johnson's expansion of government and deficits look like
an exercise in restraint by comparison, suddenly acting like the
disgusted parents, shaking their heads and wagging their fingers at the
rest of us for blowing the budget? What makes us think they can help
us? The only regulation that will truly get us out of this jam is
regulation of government. Government needs to cut up their own credit
cards. They need to give the kids the keys. And we think they can help us?
Some
of the key financial players in the country may have acted like
children but the solution is not to treat them-- and the rest of us--
like children but to demand that they grow up. Sorry son, we've already
turned your room into a quilting studio, you'll have to find your own
place to stay. Sorry daughter, you blew your month's allowance in one
night. Oh well, you'll have to figure something out on your own. No
more advances. In other words, tough love. We could use a little more
of that right now.
But won't that bring down the entire financial system? Make us all poor? Turn the whole nation into a slum (over time)?
I
don't know. What I do know is it doesn't go any good to squeeze a water
balloon. If you squeeze a water balloon what happens? You have complete
control of the area you squeeze, but all the water just goes to another
part of the balloon and changes shape. To say that the economy is a
water balloon is a little simplistic, I admit, but not really. Any
attempt to regulate a free market is just squeezing a water balloon. If
you squeeze here, you just change the shape of your problem, you move
the bad money somewhere else in the system, get rid of one bulge and
create another. The best way to handle a water balloon is not to
squeeze it. Let it find its own shape and density and distribution of
density. Let it float, let it fly, let it crash and burst, but let it
go.
Unless
we are going to scrap the free market all together and adopt a Soviet
style planned economy there is no possibility that regulation will
work. Regulation creates at least one loophole for every loophole it
fills. It creates one bulge for every bulge it squeezes. Every time we
intervene in the markets, we create a whole new set of unintended
consequences that usually exacerbate the problems we were initially
trying to solve.
So
what's the answer? Growing up. We're all adults now. The economy, the
markets, are free living beings. They correct themselves, find their
own efficiencies, if we leave them alone. Every attempt to tweak,
adjust, control, limit, just creates ripple effect after ripple
effect. Regulation stifles creativity among those who would save us by
finding a new way to generate wealth, but doesn't stop those who are
looking for unscrupulous ways to find and exploit the new bulge in the
water balloon.
I'm
not saying there isn't a place for scrutinizing the markets and the
players. That should be done, very closely and carefully, by private
initiative. There's the next big business idea for someone who can be
the first to try it. The next Bill Gates could be the person who
creates a company to provide private, independent ratings of financial
companies that actually expose the vulnerabilities. For instance, if
there were a private company that put a stamp (like the Good
Housekeeping Seal of Approval) on every legitimate financial deal, then
the world would have known, for example, that AIG did not have anywhere
near the capital reserves required to "insure" the mortgage debt they
claimed to insure. So grow up. Ask questions. Don't accept what someome
tells you without getting independent verification. Don't trust the
government to protect you from being the next victim. The government is
just as likely to be in on the fix as to be the fixer. Do your own due
dilligence. Hire someone who is capable to do it for you if you don't
feel capable yourself. Buyer beware!
You may think this isn't much of a solution, but do you really want to move back in with Mom and Dad?
-jwh-